empres-animal health 360 | No. 44(2)/2014 NEWS ©FAO/Tariq Tinazay Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8: from Asia to Europe – the highway or the flyway? Contributors: Guillaume Belot (FAO), Sophie Von Dobschuetz (FAO), Filip Claes (FAO) and Eran Raizman (FAO) T he first reports of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N8 virus date back to surveillance in live poultry markets in eastern China in November 2013 (Wu et al., 2014). The virus has since caused more than 40 outbreaks in poultry farms in China, Japan and the Republic of Korea. In early November 2014, H5N8 HPAI was detected in Europe for the first time, with outbreaks in poultry reported in Germany (one turkey-fattening farm), the Netherlands (two breeder and one layer hen farms) and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (one breeder duck farm). Genetic analysis of the isolated viruses confirmed their close similarity to the viruses spreading in eastern Asia. The same H5N8 virus was also detected in a number of wild waterfowl species in Asia, and in an apparently healthy common teal (Anas crecca) hunted in Germany to the northwest of where the poultry outbreak had been observed. These findings support the hypothesis that wild birds may have played a role in the long-distance spread of H5N8 HPAI from Asia to Europe. Experimental trials in the Republic of Korea show the virus Europe causes only mild signs associated with a low mortality rate in wild ducks, but leads to sufficient viral shedding to infect other birds by contact. It also seems likely that the virus was introduced through means other than common poultry production channels because it was detected: i) in a short time frame; ii) in three European countries and three very different production systems; and iii) in the absence of epidemiological links between the index farms of these countries or to affected farms in Asia. In addition, small genetic differences observed among the European viruses suggest that the outbreaks in Europe were caused by multiple introductions of slightly different viruses, likely originating from a pool of H5N8 viruses that has been established in bird populations following genetic evolution over time. Even if the evidence for wild birds’ involvement in the spread of H5N8 is overwhelming, questions remain about the mechanisms and species involved. The Emergency Prevention System (EMPRES), together with scientific experts and the wildlife group of the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE)/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Network of Expertise on Animal Influenza (OFFLU),1 is working on a risk assessment and surveillance guidelines for affected countries and those at risk. The World Health Organization (WHO) assessed the current risk to public health from H5N8 as extremely low. Although already widespread in poultry in Asia, H5N8 infection has so far not been confirmed in people. However, the virus is highly pathogenic for domestic poultry species, causing severe clinical signs and high mortality in chickens and turkeys. The detection of H5N8 HPAI in Europe is a reminder that avian influenza still represents a global threat to economies, trade and poultry-related livelihoods. FAO emphasizes the need for continued vigilance worldwide and heightened surveillance and biosecurity efforts, particularly on farms, to prevent contact between poultry and wild birds. 360 Reference Wu, H., Peng, X., Xu, L., Jin, C., Cheng, L., Lu, X., Xie, T., Yao, H, & Wu, N. 2014. Novel reassortant influenza A(H5N8) viruses in domestic ducks, eastern China. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 20(8): http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2008.140339. 1 http://www.offlu.net/ Eastern Asia Domestic poultry outbreak (November 2014) Domestic poultry outbreak (January - October 2014) Positive wild bird (November 2014) Positive wild bird (January - October 2014) Figure 1: Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 detected in Europe and eastern Asia in 2014 Source: EMPRES Global Animal Disease Information System (EMPRES-i). http://empres-i.fao.org/eipws3g/ Data in EMPRES-i are derived from numerous sources: FAO, OIE, official government sources, the European Commission, peer-reviewed publications, and FAO reference centres, laboratories and collaborators. 32